tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13147909.post114721290100769500..comments2023-08-07T09:34:49.500+01:00Comments on Peregrinus Hibernensis: The VulgateÉamonnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11560394580179348894noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13147909.post-1152111499007539472006-07-05T15:58:00.000+01:002006-07-05T15:58:00.000+01:00The BAC edition indeed sounds "random but charming...The BAC edition indeed sounds "random but charming"; my problem with their books generally is that they fall apart too easily. I nearly bought their Summa Theologica but realised that older colleagues had not so much a book, as two detached covers and a random collection of pages. I rather like the idea of something that will still be going strong long after I'm gone and forgotten.Éamonnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11560394580179348894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13147909.post-1152108764104179732006-07-05T15:12:00.000+01:002006-07-05T15:12:00.000+01:00I love my BAC Vulgate - not only was it cheap and ...I love my BAC Vulgate - not only was it cheap and second-hand, it's printed on paper that's a delicate shade of pink! Slightly paler than the FT. Random but charming. Oh, and it has oodles of Scriptural cross-references - and references to Denzinger!!Boecianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09805771184166935639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13147909.post-1150672106254048652006-06-19T00:08:00.000+01:002006-06-19T00:08:00.000+01:00Vulgate search for Firefox?!!! This has totally m...Vulgate search for Firefox?!!! This has totally made my day.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04043044853927442285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13147909.post-1148137303450835182006-05-20T16:01:00.000+01:002006-05-20T16:01:00.000+01:00Daniel, you're absolutely right in scholarly terms...Daniel, you're absolutely right in scholarly terms. If I were a biblical or theological-historical scholar I'd agree with you down the line. The only point I'm making is that if you want a good reading copy of the Vulgate, one with punctuation is better. I do actually read my Sixto-Clementine Vulgate for spiritual edification (or so I hope) so I'm content to have one with all that dreadful neo-Modernist clutter like commas and full points :-)<BR/><BR/>PS You're not connected to the <A HREF="http://thrownback.blogspot.com/2005/05/for-real-traditionalists-reader.html" REL="nofollow">Society of St Pius I</A> by any chance? It's just that if that text were any more trad it'd be in Hebrew!<BR/><BR/>http://thrownback.blogspot.com/2005/05/for-real-traditionalists-reader.htmlÉamonnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11560394580179348894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13147909.post-1147809802372373732006-05-16T21:03:00.000+01:002006-05-16T21:03:00.000+01:00I rather like my Stuttgart Vulgate. It may be a sc...I rather like my Stuttgart Vulgate. It may be a scholarly reconstruction, rather than an historical text, but it supposedly is as close to the original Hieronyman text as anything yet published. And unpunctuated - now <I>that's</I> trad.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com